IATF 16949
Benefit from Our Experience
An IATF 16949 Internal Audit is
a systematic, independent, and documented review of your organization's Quality Management System. It ensures the QMS
conforms to IATF 16949 requirements
is effectively implemented
is efficient
drives continuous improvement.
(616) 365-9822
Our Guarantee
"We offer a no cost, no obligation initial analysis as well as accomplishment Guarantees."
Brandon Kerkstra - President of MSG
IATF 16949
IATF 16949 is an international standard for automotive Quality Management Systems (QMS), developed by the International Automotive Task Force (IATF).
It specifies requirements for a quality management system to ensure consistent product quality, defect prevention, and reduction of variation and waste in the automotive supply chain.
Core Purpose
To enhance customer satisfaction by promoting continual improvement, risk management, and compliance with automotive industry requirements, ensuring high-quality products and processes across the supply chain.
APQP
Advanced Product Quality Planning (APQP) is a structured framework used within the IATF 16949 standard to ensure that automotive products meet customer requirements and quality expectations before full-scale production begins.
Developed by the Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG), APQP provides a systematic approach to product development, emphasizing risk management, defect prevention, and continuous improvement. It consists of five phases—Plan and Define Program, Product Design and Development, Process Design and Development, Product and Process Validation, and Feedback, Assessment, and Corrective Action.
These phases guide cross-functional teams in defining customer needs, designing robust products and processes, validating manufacturing capabilities, and establishing feedback loops to ensure quality and compliance with IATF 16949 requirements (e.g., clause 8.3 for design and development). APQP integrates tools like Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), Control Plans, and Production Part Approval Process (PPAP) to align product development with customer-specific requirements and regulatory standards.
For IATF 16949, APQP serves as a cornerstone for achieving consistent quality across the automotive supply chain. It ensures that organizations proactively address potential risks, verify process capability, and meet stringent customer expectations, such as those from OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturers). By embedding quality planning into the product lifecycle, APQP supports IATF 16949’s core purpose of enhancing customer satisfaction through defect prevention and waste reduction. It requires collaboration among engineering, quality, manufacturing, and supply chain teams to deliver products that are reliable, safe, and compliant. The process also facilitates traceability and documentation, critical for IATF 16949 audits, ensuring that all stages of product and process development are verifiable and aligned with the standard’s requirements for continual improvement and risk-based thinking.
What Triggers an IATF 16949 Internal Audit?
| Event | Frequency | Scope | Typical Responsibility |
| Regular Scheduled Internal Audit | Annually (minimum, as per IATF 16949 clause 9.2.2.2) | Comprehensive review of all quality management system (QMS) processes, including manufacturing, support processes, and customer-specific requirements. | Internal Audit Team (trained auditors, independent of the audited area), led by the Quality Manager or designated audit coordinator. |
| Significant Process Change | As needed | Affected processes, procedures, or departments impacted by the change. | Quality Manager, with input from process owners |
| New Product Introduction (NPI) | Prior to production launch or as part of Advanced Product Quality Planning (APQP) | Product-specific processes, including design, development, and production planning | Cross-functional team, including Quality, Engineering, and Production |
| Customer Complaint or Nonconformity | As needed | Processes related to the nonconformity, root cause analysis, and corrective actions | Quality Manager, with support from relevant process owners |
| Major Corrective Action Implementation | After implementation of corrective actions (post-audit or post-issue) | Specific processes or areas where corrective actions were applied to verify effectiveness. | Internal Audit Team, with oversight by the QMS Manager & process owners. |
| Supplier Performance Issues | As needed, when supplier-related issues impact quality | Supplier management processes and related QMS elements (per clause 8.4). | Quality Manager and Purchasing/Supplier Quality teams, with audits focusing on supplier controls. |
| Management Review Follow-Up | As determined during management review (clause 9.3) | Specific processes or areas identified as needing improvement | Quality Manager, with input from top management |
| Certification or Surveillance Audit Preparation | Prior to external IATF 16949 certification or surveillance audits | Entire QMS to ensure compliance with IATF 16949 and customer-specific requirements. | Internal Audit Team, led by the Quality Manager, with involvement of all relevant departments. |
| Organizational Changes | As needed | Affected QMS processes, roles, and responsibilities | Quality Manager, with support from HR and department heads. |
Notes:
- Frequency: IATF 16949 mandates internal audits at planned intervals (clause 9.2.2.2), typically annually, but additional audits are triggered by specific events or risks. The audit program must cover all QMS processes over a defined period (e.g., three years for certification cycles).
- Scope: The scope varies based on the event, ranging from specific processes to the entire QMS, ensuring compliance with IATF 16949 requirements and customer-specific expectations.
- Responsibility: Internal audits must be conducted by competent, independent auditors (clause 7.2.3). The Quality Manager typically oversees the audit program, with process owners responsible for addressing findings.
Several events can trigger an IATF internal audit beyond the routine audit schedule. These audits are intended to ensure the management system remains effective, compliant, and aligned with business needs and risks.
Here are the most common triggering events:
Internal Audit Triggers by Clause and Process
|
|
|
|
Triggering Event | Typical Frequency / Timing | Scope of Audit | Typical Responsibility |
Annual/Programmed audit cycle (risk-based plan) | Planned at least annually; cadence set by risk & customer-specific requirements | Full QMS (ISO 9001 + IATF add-ons); includes manufacturing process and product audits | Quality Manager / Lead Auditor (approval by Top Management) |
New product or process introduction (APQP/PPAP) | Before SOP and/or within first production runs | Affected processes, control plan, PFMEA, work instructions, measurement systems | Quality Manager with Process Owner / Manufacturing Engineering |
Significant change to the 4Ms (Man, Machine, Material, Method) or software | As soon as practical after change; often within 30 days | Changed process steps, control plan updates, SPC, gaging/MSA, reaction plans | Process Owner; Internal Audit Lead to schedule |
Customer complaint, 0-km failure, field/warranty spike | Immediate special audit; typically within 5–10 working days | Concerned product/process, containment & corrective actions, traceability, effectiveness checks | Quality Manager / Customer Liaison; Lead Auditor |
External audit major nonconformity (certification or customer) | Prior to CA closure due date | Areas tied to the NC; verification of root cause, corrective action, and systemic fix | Lead Auditor with Area Owners; Top Management oversight |
Loss of customer approval/special status (e.g., new business hold, controlled shipping) | Immediately upon notification | Customer-impacting processes; escalation controls (CS1/CS2), communication, shipment release | Quality Manager / Plant Manager |
Serious nonconforming product escape (internal or to customer) | Trigger unscheduled audit within days of detection | Escape path, inspection/verification, corrective action deployment, effectiveness | Quality Manager; Lead Auditor; Logistics if shipped |
Supplier quality incident affecting your product | Upon incident; align with supplier containment timeline | Incoming controls, special characteristics, supplier management & PPAP status | Supplier Quality + Internal Audit Lead |
Process moves/relocation, layout change, or new/overhauled equipment | Pre-move readiness & post-move validation windows | Process capability, control plan conformity, maintenance/TPM, verification of first-off/last-off | Manufacturing Engineering / Maintenance / Lead Auditor |
Extended shutdown/startup (e.g., long holiday, strike, pandemic) | Before restart and within first production lots | Start-up checks, calibration status, staffing/competence, control plan adherence | Operations Manager / Quality Manager |
High turnover/new shift or critical role changes | Within first weeks of staffing change | Training/competence, work instruction use, layered checks, error-proofing | HR/Training with Process Owners; Internal Audit Lead |
Change to customer-specific requirements (CSR) or regulatory rules | Immediately after change is released | CSR/regulatory deployment, documentation updates, compliance evidence | Quality Systems / Compliance; Lead Auditor |
Recurring scrap, rework, or capability degradation (Cpk/Ppk trend) | When KPIs breach thresholds or trends turn adverse | SPC execution, reaction plans, special characteristics, maintenance & tooling | Process Owner; Quality Engineering; Internal Audit |
Post-corrective action verification (from prior internal findings) | By the agreed CA due date; follow-up per risk | Effectiveness of actions, systemic fixes, prevention across similar areas | Lead Auditor with Area Owner |
IT/measurement system changes (MES/ERP/PLC/gaging software) | After release and stabilization period | Data integrity, backup/restore, access control, MSA impact, record retention | IT/Metrology; Quality Systems; Internal Audit |
Management request based on risk or strategy (e.g., new customer launch) | As directed by Management Review outputs | Areas defined by risk priority: product safety, special characteristics, logistics, etc. | Top Management; Quality Manager / Lead Auditor |
Product safety or legal/compliance concern | Immediate special audit | Safety-related controls, escalation, regulatory evidence, recall/traceability readiness | Product Safety Officer / Compliance / Lead Auditor |
Layered Process Audit (LPA) triggers (if required by CSR or risk) | Per LPA calendar; increase frequency if misses/escapes occur | High-risk steps, error-proofing, standardized work, control plan checks | Area Supervisors, Managers, and Quality (tiered) |
New external provider or critical material change | At first receipts and early production | Incoming verification, material specs, certificates, special characteristics | Purchasing / Supplier Quality / Internal Audit |
Environmental or utility disruption affecting process stability | Soon after event and restart | Process robustness, equipment condition, re-qualification, product verification | Maintenance / Operations / Quality |
Management Solutions Group
Professional Services
Focused On
Our Clients
With a combined 100 years of experience in quality and process management systems, MSG presents practical solutions to companies that want help or are struggling to obtain their first certification or working to be certified or improve in new areas of business.
Copyright 2008 - 2021 Management Solutions Group, All Rights Reserved