Our workshops are hands on learning events that focus on your processes and designs. These onsite or virtual sessions can be focused on training newer staff or staff transitioning from the 4th edition AIAG FMEA methods. All of our training staff have worked with the previous 4th edition AIAG FMEA Manual and understand the challenges of the new FMEA approach, and the resources and knowledge required. We have 2 specific training options for organizations

For Practitioners:

These classes will help organizations and staff understand the new format of the FMEA forms and how to utilize the new format to implement the 7 Step Process along with the 5T’s needed to effectively create FMEA’s that will:

• Provide prioritized actions to reduce for potential risk
• Provide opportunities for preventive actions and continual improvement
• Effectively document cause & effects of failures
• Document preventive and detection risk
• Increase the usefulness of the resulting FMEA’s for continual improvement
• Ensure that your staff are creating the new FMEA's inthe most efficient way possible

We also offer options to start a draft of a current 4th Edition FMEA in the new format prior to the training to help workshop participants view the results of the process

For Auditors:

This training is specifically for auditors (3rd Party and Internal) with a focus on an overview of the FMEA process, the new FMEA requirements (Design and Process), and how to audit this as part of the management system and process audit.

(Determination of Legal and Other Requirements):

Management Solutions Group has team members competent in the regulatory requirements for safety & environment and as such can assist an organization with their required Evaluation of Compliance with Legal requirements that apply to the organization and advise on how to take these into account with the Management System. Those organizations with ISO 14001 Environmental Management Systems will be familiar with this process. For others, we will review the regulations and your processes determine the applicable requirements. These would then be managed through operational controls. If you have questions, we would be happy to discuss the requirements and your options.

Take a 45001 Course on Ingentius.com.

The events of this past year have created challenges for many organizations working to complete internal audits and maintain their management systems. With the large number of organizations that we work with, we have encountered some specific issues that affect most of them and some specific solutions to these challenges.

The EPA has released the Hazardous Generator Improvement Rule, Federally Implemented starting May 30, 2017, and adopted by states thereafter (Typically July 1, 2018 or July 1, 2019 or later) and Michigan as of August 1, 2020. Note that this does not only apply to organization that are ISO 14001 Certified, but any organization with any wastes. The EPA estimates, based on regular inspections, that up-to 30% of all organizations are noncompliant with these rules. One of the goals of this revision was to make the rules more understandable.

This article is not intended to be a full review of the requirements, just some highlights of the changes that affect the large number service and manufacturing organizations. There is a lot of free information available on the web. If you have any specific questions just contact us and we will assist you or point you in the correct direction for details.

Some of the changes that affect a lot of our clients are:

2020 Challenges: What should I be focusing on with my Management Systems (Quality, Environmental, Safety, Laboratory, Information Security…)

• What should I do to make sure my 3^rd party audit goes well?
• What should I do to help my company through these challenging times?

With the pandemic and staff working from home, the management systems (ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 45001 etc.) follow through can be a challenge, as well as the internal audit and improvement processes.  Many organizations are working in smaller groups, performing more of the basic functions, and skipping some of the important documentation due to other important organizational needs. This does not leave us without opportunities to accomplish important tasks.  Here are a few suggestions that will not only create improvements and risk reduction, but will also continue to support a management system’s requirements:

• Conduct internal audits focused on documentation and records. This can be done remotely and can also identify outdated language, redundant documentation that may not be consistent, and areas for improvement. These audits can be followed up with documentation and records process improvements. Future audits can always include increased production or manufacturing floor audits as a focus.
• Focus the audit and risk identification processes on contingency plans. This can allow an organization to document lessons learned and improve the organizations processes and contingency plans going forward. It will likely be some time before things in most organizations really return to normal, so improvements in these areas can be valuable for an organization.
• Management system staff and internal auditors can also assist departments and areas of the company organize and improve their processes in a changing environment. These staff are typically more trained and focused on this aspect of the work which can be of great value to many areas of an organization.
• Some specific areas to watch:
  • IATF Temporary Change requirements
  • Automotive PPAP requirements for internal changes
  • IATF Shutdown and Startup requirements, where applicable
  • Scheduling processes where order quantities are changing
  • Changes to workflow and security requirements for staff working remotely
  • Supplier management and development – many of the above items would also apply to the organization’s suppliers, and to protect your organization, you may want to ensure you are reviewing suppliers to determine if they are proactively addressing these changes and associated risks

(IATF 16949 Surveillance audit, transition audit, upgrade audit)

We have been reviewing the data from many sources on the common nonconformances during transition audits for IATF 16949: 2016 as well as ISO 9001, ISO 14001, AS9100, ISO 13485 and now ISO 17025.

Some things stay the same

An analysis of the data identified many nonconformances that are consistent with audits conducted prior to the newly revised standards. These nonconformance are more common than those written to the new requirements for companies that spend more time addressing the new requirements explicitly in their management systems. Examples include:

• A gage that is past due for calibration without any extension records
• Control Plans and PFMEAs that do not match
• Work instructions that are not being followed or out of date…

Here is some very good advice on migrating to the new 16949 standard.

When you are looking at upgrading your management systems to meet the new requirements, you really need a solid approach to the project ahead. One important piece of advice that we have learned from experience is that when resources are needed for a project like this, it is critical to obtain the resources at the beginning of the project. If you are able to muddle your way through the process and achieve registration to the new standard which the hopes of finding resources to make the necessary improvement to the management system after certification, you will likely be disappointed. Here are some additional suggestions to the approach to the project:

What are notable changes?

The new ISO 9001 standard aligns with high-level organizational structure, requiring all new ISO management system standards to be aligned on a high-level structure with a set of common requirements.